Calculation of the Mathematical Reserve

1. The Mathematical Reserve is to be determined separately for each insurance contract by a prospective method of valuation in accordance with the instructions below.
    
2. The valuation method shall take into account all prospective contingencies under which any contributions (by the participant) or benefits (to the participant/beneficiary) may be payable under the policy, as determined by the policy conditions. The level of benefits takes into account the reasonable expectations of participants (with regard to bonuses, including terminal bonuses, if any) and any established practices of the Company for payment of benefits.
    
3. The estimated amount of liability under each policy shall be determined based on prudent assumptions of all relevant parameters and in line with global actuarial standards. The value of each such parameter shall be based on the Company’s expected experience and shall include an appropriate margin for adverse deviations that may result in an increase in the amount of the mathematical reserve.
    
4. In case of a negative reserve, the Actuary shall set the amount of such mathematical reserve at zero, or to the guaranteed surrender value in case of such guaranteed surrender value deficiency reserve, as the case may be. For unit-linked business, the mathematical reserve may be negative, but the Actuary shall set the mathematical reserve to a level so that the sum of the mathematical reserve and the unit reserve is at least as large as the guaranteed surrender value.
    
5. The Actuary shall not make allowance for any future lapse, surrender, making paid-up or revival of a contract where such an allowance would result in a decrease in the liability in respect of that contract.
    
6. The Actuary shall take into account vested, declared or allotted bonuses or other forms of participation to which participants are already either collectively or individually contractually entitled.
    
7. The Actuary shall take into account discretionary charges and deductions from Policy Benefits, in so far as they do not exceed the reasonable expectations of participants.
    
8. The Actuary shall take into account expenses, including commissions. The expenses shall take either implicit or explicit account of future increases considered likely in expenses for existing business based on prudent assumptions as to the future rates of changes in prices and earnings.
    
9. Consideration shall be given to the impact of selective withdrawals in the allowance for future expenses, particularly where the allowance is not assessed on a per policy basis.
    
10. Explicit allowance for future expenses is required for all contracts under which no future contributions are receivable where these are not provided by disclosed margins in the valuation rate of yield.
     
11. Proper provision must be made for claims handling expenses, directly or indirectly. This is particularly relevant to classes of business such as permanent health insurance where these expenses are likely to be significant.
     
12. Where a net contribution method is used it is permissible to take credit for the difference between the gross contribution and the valuation net contribution in assessing the provision to be made for meeting the expenses likely to be incurred in the future in fulfilling the existing contracts, but only to the extent allowed by global actuarial standards.
     
13. The Actuary shall take into account any rights under contracts of reinsurance.
     
14. The Actuary shall take into account any other options that the participant has in respect of the policy, or by virtue of the contract, and that provision shall be made on prudent assumptions to cover any increase in liabilities caused by participants exercising options under their contracts. Treatment of options should be in line with global actuarial standards.
     
15. 15. The provisions for unit-linked funds should be the unit value and depends on what the guarantees are in the product. So the provisions should be provided keeping in mind guaranteed return if any in addition to basing it on the future expected unit value.
     
16. The Actuary shall use one of the common methods which would be suitable for the size, nature and complexity of the business. Common methods like Gross Contribution Method of valuation or retrospective method may be used if demonstrated to be at least as prudent. The Actuary shall give an explanation for the method adopted and the method shall be consistent from year to year. In case the Actuary decides to change the method being used from previous years, sufficient explanation to the same needs to be provided.
     
17. The method of calculation of the amount of liabilities and the assumptions for the valuation parameters shall not be subject to arbitrary discontinuities from one year to the next. The calculation of the net present value of payments is to be based on a portfolio of (AAA) rated sovereign risk securities with a similar expected payment profile to the liability being measured. In case the market yields for longer term durations are not available within UAE, in such a case US$ market yield of a (AAA) rated sovereign risk securities should be considered as a measure for AED longer term durations.
     
18. The determination of the amount of mathematical reserve shall take into account the nature and term of the assets representing those liabilities and the value placed upon them and shall include prudent provision against the effects of possible future changes in the value of assets on the ability of the Company to meet its obligations arising under policies as they arise.
     
19. Technical Provisions (including Mathematical Reserves) considered for Solvency purposes should not include unit-linked funds’ reserves to the extent that it does not include the guaranteed portion of the insurance policies with the unit-linked funds.
     
20. Mortality Rates used must be conservative. The Actuary should provide reinsurance rates or refer to any published mortality table that is justifiable.
     
21. ensitivity to assumptions used should be provided.
     
22. Persistency – Lapse analysis should be provided where applicable.
     
23. In the event of lack of clarity on specific assumptions not defined above for calculating the Mathematical Reserves, the Actuary can apply actuarial best practices but must provide justification and quote relevant actuarial standards in the valuation report.